Choice can work against veterans

By Tom Phillpot: Military Update

The Senate voted on Aug. 3 to allow paid attorneys, for the first time in over a century, to represent veterans in filing disability claims with the Department of Veterans Affairs.

“It’s like inviting the wolf into the chicken house,” said retired Air Force Lt. Col. Charley Burch.

Burch, 74, spent 18 years after he retired from the military helping veterans in Virginia apply for VA disability benefits. As a veterans’ claim agent on state salary, Burch’s help was free to any Virginia veteran. He says he knew the in-and-outs of filing a successful disability claim, better than any lawyer he knew, and he didn’t charge a fee.

Like some of the largest veterans’ services organizations, including Disabled American Veterans and Veterans of Foreign War, Burch strongly opposes a bill that “helps lawyers, not veterans.”

Lawyer groups, particularly legal advocates for veterans, did lobby for the change, along with a few retired appellate court judges and some of the smaller veterans groups. But they did so, they said, because veterans deserve the right to hire a lawyer, from the start of the claims process, to deal with increasingly complex laws and regulations and in recognition that valuable assets — tax-free VA disability benefits — are at stake.

“This thing sounds innocuous,” Burch countered. “They’re saying, ‘We are giving veterans a choice. Choice is always good.’ Well, choice isn’t always good. What really scares me is this thing is flying below the radar,” not drawing much attention even though it soon could become law.

Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, first became interested in securing paid attorney representation for veterans filing claims after reading a guest editorial in the Washington Post last January written by James C. McKay, an attorney for a prominent Washington D.C. law firm, said a committee staff member,

McKay’s piece, “Who Can Fight for the Soldiers?” argued that veterans mature and responsible enough to defend their country should be seen as competent to hire a lawyer if they want legal advice pursuing VA benefits.

Following the Civil War, Congress first imposed a limit of $5 on fees lawyers could charge to assist veterans with their pensions and bonuses. The cap was raised to $10 a short time later but hasn’t been raised since. The practical effect, McKay explained, is to bar lawyers from representing veterans until they exhaust a lengthy administrative process of their claims and get an adverse decision from the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.

By that time, McKay wrote, “a case has been lost, often because the veteran did not present the correct claim, or properly present available evidence — technicalities that could hurt the case on appeal even after a lawyer is involved.”

He gave examples of injustices suffered by individual veterans for lack of a lawyer’s care and knowledge early in the process.

Craig introduced the Veterans’ Choice of Representation Act of 2006 (S 2694) on May 2. It attracted only four co-sponsors, all of them lawyers, three fellow Republicans plus an Independent. A hearing on this and four other bills was held June 8. In early August, the Senate passed S. 2694, which by then was a robust package of VA benefit changes. It did so by unanimous consent so no individual senator had to record their vote.

Craig feels it’s “a matter of fairness,” said committee spokesman Jeff Schrade. “The chairman feels very strongly that veterans are adults and they can spend their money however they want to spend it.”

Tom Philpott can be contacted at Military Update, P.O. Box 231111, Centreville, Va. 20120-1111, or by e-mail at:
milupdate@aol.com